Monday, October 1, 2012

Pictures of Kibera




Nairobi is the capital of Kenya and the urban center of East Africa. The busy roundabouts, shimmering skyscrapers, and thousands of jay-walking pedestrians offer both an intimidating and rushing experience. For many hours each day, the city is locked up in “jam.” The concept of lanes seems to evaporate and is consumed by a highway free-for-all. Travelers are in a metal and fiberglass jungle where only the aggressive survive.

After busting out of the city center and whipping around the roundabout near the large hospital, the traveler finds himself on a two-lane road leading to the suburbs out of town. Massive shopping centers – China Center, Nakumatt, Adams Arcarde, and The Junction –   are concentrated on this long strip of road. Within a stone’s throw of the spotless food court at Prestige Plaza lies one of the most unsanitary living conditions on the planet. Kibera – said to be Sub-Saharan Africa’s largest informal settlement – hides politely behind the colossal walls and mopped isles of that which represents a “developed” Kenya.

At the Steers burger chain just outside of the slum, Kenyan parents are seen buying their children ice cream cones. Just a short walk away, parents struggle to feed their children. Worse, children struggle to feed themselves. The difference between “developed” and “developing” is stark. Those witnessing the transition are often surprised and speechless. The speed at which the neighborhood goes “bad” is like a punch in the gut. The ice cream cone we just licked dry is an unthinkable luxury for the thousands who dwell nearby.

Kibera is a 1.5 square mile area that tightly sleeps one million people. Perhaps rivaling an avalanche, the Kibera slum has the power to consume those who visit. Roads are too narrow for many vehicles and paths can suddenly end, dip, narrow, or wind endlessly. Before you know it, you are at the mercy of an iron sheet maze that can intimidate even the well travelled. Visitors better not venture in without someone who knows their way around. Interestingly enough, Kibera is below the threshold of neighborhoods that deter visitors and has instead developed into a poverty icon. After being featured in award-winning main-stream movies (The Constant Gardener) and independent films (Kibera Kid), Kibera has become a “must see” stop when visiting Nairobi. The controversial practice of poverty tours, deemed “poorism” by its detractors and “community tourism” by its supporters, is alive and well in Kibera. While walking around downtown Nairobi, I realized that I saw more wazungu (white people) in Kibera than in the city center.

Cameras ready, well-meaning tourists snap away at smiling children who are so used to having their picture taken, they automatically assume the thumbs up position that they think tourists love. Accustomed to visitors with digital cameras, most demand to see the picture you just snapped and will ask for another if they think they look funny. Some love the attention. Tour companies don’t say Kibera is “the world’s friendliest slum” for no reason. The people smile, wave, and welcome you to their shops. Children are always shouting when they spot a mzungu. “How are you!? How are you!?” Most wazungu continue saying, “I’m fine” until they are out of the children’s view. Others feel like a spectacle; they believe the wazungu will just show all of their friends back at home how they helped the poor black people. A resident of Kibera who works at a car wash is quoted in one of the country’s leading newspapers as saying, “They see us like puppets, they want to come and take pictures, have a little walk, tell their friends they’ve been to the worst slum in Africa.” Despite the complaints, numerous projects that benefit the community exist because of the people who take those pictures and share the stories.

Those who take the pictures are dealt a difficult hand as far as how to portray Kibera to those at home to whom we show the pictures. Is it a place of misery, sorrow, and helplessness? Or is it a place of kindness, community, and fellowship? Is it a place where danger reigns? Where girls fear rape? Where alcohol and drugs are the tools of survival? Or is it a testament to the resilience of people who may have little material possessions, but big dreams and even greater faith? Is it a notch in our belt that we “survived” our visit to Kibera? Is it just another mission opportunity? Is it a storybook version of what it means to be poor? Or is it just more poor Africans who need our help? Is it a place where you walk away a changed person, not knowing whether to appreciate or loathe what possessions you have? Or is it just another place on the planet? Is it an excuse to protest or a reason to fundraise? Is a just a good experience; a stop on the trip?

For others, the questions have a personal twist. Is it the boy who prayed the Lord’s prayer, and concentrated extra hard on Give us this day our daily bread? Is it the place you were able to share in the Lord’s Supper with people suffering from HIV/AIDS, and even though you knew you couldn’t relate, you knew you were connected through the blood of Christ. Is it a little girl who held your hand? Is it the family that takes in orphaned children even though they have barely enough resources to provide for their own?

When you show the pictures of the sewage flowing through the road and the children walking barefoot, is it a story of hope or a story of desperation? When you show pictures of abandoned children in orphanages, do you talk about adoption, or do you talk about disease? When you show pictures of those the world labels “impoverished,” do you talk about their hardship or their happiness? A picture is worth a thousand words, but in order to determine what those words are, the photographer must answer some of these questions.

To others, Kibera means something more academic or political. Kibera is the result of African urbanization. The pull of urban opportunities and the push of rural poverty leads to chronic housing shortages. The shack settlements offers a place relatively free from government control and cheap living accommodation, many paying KES 500 – 1000 ($6.50 – $13.25 USD) for monthly rent.
Those who migrate into the urban area also migrate daily into the city. A sea of people gets ready for work and walks to their nearest matatu boarding location. The masses who haven’t found jobs seek out an existence in the informal economy, operating small shops or performing daily labor. Still, a middle class exists in Kibera who decide to stay even after they find some success. Thousands of “experts” devote their time to slum upgrading strategies and eradication plans. In September of 2009, the government began relocating small numbers of residents to housing complexes which loom large over the Southern border of the slum. The reaction to these removal plans is mixed.

But – you may ask - Does it really matter what those who take the pictures say? To some extent, yes. The interpretations and feelings of visitors ripple across the world to the  homes and communities of the picture-takers. A child wearing tattered clothes and a smile is a nameless star in stories of people in far-off lands. They appear at fundraiser slideshows, in photo albums, and within frames on the wall. They accompany stories – those of “flying toilets,” garbage-lined streets, or community schools bursting with children. Running a google search of Kibera would lead to a wealth of blogs from both organizations and individuals, offering their interpretation or experience in Kibera.

The interpretation that derives from experience and memory shapes the attitude and response of those who desire to help. Is Kibera a primitive form of existence that Westerners are all too ready to attribute to Africa? Is it a community of people who deserve our pity and can only escape with the help of our illuminating presence? Is it a problem that only requires more money and resources thrown in its direction? Is it a blank slate waiting for the writing of those who want to help? Is it a place where the people are to be helped, not listened too? Or is it so much more?

Perhaps the weakness in analysis is the desire to generalize. Kibera is many things. The reality of Kibera transcends the interpretation of outsiders. Regardless of what I think or say, what the movies show, or the consensus in the countless interpretation of pictures, life goes on for the people of Kibera. I often ponder whether or not we have it all wrong. When I talk to my friends in Kibera and count down the days until I get to return to visit so many people I have grown to love, it seems like it is just another place on earth with people of all kinds of personalities, talents, and dreams. People I admire, miss, and love.

An East African travel guide warns “…‘Nairobbery”, as it is often called by residents, is commonly regarded as the most dangerous city in Africa…[and] the majority of problems happen in the slums.” The place has its share of con-artists, violent criminals, rapists, drug addicts, and gang leaders. Tragically, the area has before fallen into ethnic violence. Children tell of their experience being tear-gassed by police. Disease is prevalent; sanitation is not. Death is an everyday reality. You better not go out at night. It smells bad and it is loud. Walking in Kibera is no walk in the park. However, the pictures of endless shacks, garbage, and sewage rarely display the beauty I find in Kibera. Perhaps this explains why people do not understand my desire, and the desire of so many others, to return.

Kibera is a confusing place that invokes weird emotions. Perhaps the phrase “It’s complicated” would work best. Visitors do not know whether to feel confused, angry, inspired, heart-broken, appreciative, energized, or a combination of them all. HIV/AIDS is prevalent and the living affected and infected are everywhere – orphans, widows, and families who have lost loved ones.

I stopped taking pictures, because I still do not know what to say or how to answer the questions.

(Updated Version. Originally posted on the CSCM website, June 1, 2010)

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

A Time for Everything

Two years ago, I partnered with Reverend Dennis and Deaconess Lorna Meeker to form Compassionate Social Care Ministries (CSCM) as a nonprofit corporation with a mission of providing comprehensive care to orphaned and vulnerable children in Kenya. In 2010, over $110,000 was raised. Through CSCM, hundreds of children are given the opportunity to attend quality schools, others are fed through feeding programs,  and the CSCM Rescue Center continues to provide care and shelter to children who have no where else to live. God has truly blessed this ministry and the children that CSCM serves. 
On June 29, 2011, I informed the Meekers and the Board of Directors of my resignation from CSCM. I have thoughtfully and prayerfully considered this decision for quite some time. Though it deeply saddens me to leave the organization, I know in my heart I have made the right decision. I have been working with the Meekers for the past month, planning a transition to another team of individuals in the United States to coordinate the affairs of the organization. With careful planning, this transition will not adversely affect the children under CSCM’s care.
For the past two years, I have dedicated my life to building a nonprofit organization to care for orphans in Kenya. When I brought Jonathan and Shelly to Reverend Dennis and Deaconess Lorna in December 2008, they did not hesitate for even a second to care for them. Despite their limited resources, Dennis and Lorna will always find a way to help a child in need, even if it means sacrificing their own savings. Even though there were many times we disagreed, I have always admired their love for their children. I am thankful for the opportunity to have partnered with them both.
The past two years have not been easy. I have made many mistakes, but because of them, I have learned so much and realize that I have much to learn. At nineteen years old, I do not think many people expected me to succeed at running a nonprofit organization. Perhaps they were right; I had no idea the workload that was heading my way, the situations I would encounter, and the adversity I would have to overcome. I was certainly not perfect, but I worked my tail off and did my best. I would not exchange my experience with CSCM for anything. 
I have learned about hope and hopelessness, love and hate, comfort and pain, smiles and tears. Our children unknowingly radically changed my life while I intentionally tried to influence theirs. They are my inspiration. I went to Kenya after high school searching for an experience before starting college; I left Kenya with a purpose. I did not meet Pastor Meeker in Beecher, Illinois four months before going to Kenya on accident. I did not walk into a mud hut orphanage in the middle of the Kibera slum on December 1, 2008 and find two desperate children on accident. I am confident that every part of my journey, from the picture-perfect campus of Furman University, to the slums of Nairobi, from the foreclosed house in Illinois, to the Rescue Center in Kisumu, have been part of a larger plan for my life, even if it has not been fully revealed to me.
I am eternally grateful for my friends and family that have not only lent their ears for my frustration and their time for a cause I care so deeply about, but also sacrificed their hard earned money to provide for the children that I love. I appreciate your willingness to listen to my never ending supply of plans, no matter how insane. Your generosity has not gone unnoticed.
As I left Kenya in December 2010, all of the children living at the CSCM Rescue Center gathered together in the living room to say goodbye. They had been trying to convince me for the past several days to stay. I told them that if it was up to me, I would stay and be their “uncle” forever. But I had to go to school. They asked when I was coming back; I told them I didn’t know, but it would probably be a long time. I was supposed to lead the devotion, but I was so emotional I knew it would not go very well.
I asked one of the older girls to pray. When she finished, I opened up to Ecclesiastes 3 and began reading... "There is an appointed time for everything.  And there is a time for every event under heaven ~ A time to give birth, and a time to die; A time to plant, and a time to uproot what is planted. A time to kill, and a time to heal; A time to tear down, and a time to build up.” I could no longer read. I did my best to get out the rest of the chapter, but I was so choked up I do not think anyone understood what I was saying.
At the end, I added “A time to come, and I time to go... It is now my time to go.” 
For two years, I told the world where to shove it. I danced to the beat of my own drum; I dropped out of college for a while; I gave everything I had away; I suffered with the children I cared so deeply about. I dedicated all of my thoughts and every second of my day to my kids. Despite my best efforts to ignore Him, God has made it increasingly clear that it is time to go.


Friday, April 15, 2011

What are Faith-Based Organizations doing to support orphans?

After extended families, Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs) are one of the only means by which external support is reaching orphans and other vulnerable children (Foster, 2005).

How are Faith-Based Organizations supporting orphaned children in Sub-Saharan Africa? The graph from this powerpoint presentation provides an interesting insight.



Foster, G., "Religion and Responses to Orphans in Africa." A Generation at Risk: The Global Impact of HIV/AIDS on Orphans and Vulnerable Children. New York: Cambridge UP, 2005. 159-180.

Friday, April 8, 2011

Visualizing a Response

During my paper writing procrastination, I put a few more diagrams together.

The first diagram illustrates what research has consistently concluded on orphan care in Sub-Saharan Africa. 90% of orphans are being cared for by members of their extended family. The remaining 10% (highlighted in red) find themselves in orphanages, child-headed households, domestic servitude, or a variety of other unfortunate situations.

Diagram 1.

The second diagram illustrates the effects of building orphanages as a primary response to orphan care in Sub-Saharan Africa. This diagram is an oversimplification, but it illustrates an important point. The purpose is to provide a visual example.

Orphanages absorb children far beyond their intended target. The child surrounded with the red box (the 1 out of every 10 that has no competent extended family members) is often the segment of the population orphanages claim to be targeting. However, a significant number of children living in orphanages are far outside of this target population (as indicated by the larger red box). For example, the blue children are those with one or both parents. There is research that suggests that as many as 4 out of 5 children living in orphanages have a living parent. Building orphanages removes children from families (Causality is discussed in separate posts).

Diagram 2 also illustrates that orphans who have adequate extended family members to care for them also end up in orphanages. This often happens to provide the child with an educational opportunity.   The black dot indicates the target child for orphanages. The grey arrows demonstrate that orphanages draw children away from families outside of the orphanage's intended target.

Diagram 2
The third diagram illustrates the opposite approach. Orphans are supported by strategies that strengthen the families who care for them. The grey arrow demonstrates that as these support strategies are more and more successful, they will absorb additional children into families. This ultimately decreases the number of children who "need" to be institutionalized.

Diagram 3

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Diagrams Anyone?

Diagrams adapted by J. Fraher from Foster, G. "The Capacity of the Extended Family Safety Net for Orphans in Africa." Psychology, Health, & Medicine 5.1 (2000): 55-62. 

I adapted these diagrams to illustrate two approaches to orphan care taking into consideration the extended-family framework. My intention was to illustrate two different approaches and their effects on extended families. As you can see, I argue that orphanages draw children away from extended families, weakening the safety-net. Conversely, there are a number of reinforcement strategies that strengthen the safety-net.



Friday, March 25, 2011

Land Rovers vs. Mud Huts


In a study by Brigitte Zimmerman entitled "Orphan Living Situations in Malawi: A Comparison of Orphanages and Foster Homes," a community member is quoted as saying:

"We appreciate the outsiders taking care of our children, but of course, we always know that it is because they have so much money. They drive around in their Land Rovers and we just think, ‘Of course, if I had that much money, I could help my own children.’ If we could choose between having outsiders solve the problem with their money, and finding a way to get our own money and do it ourselves, I think most of us would rather perform the services ourselves (Zimmerman, 911)."


Any program that draws orphans away from extended families instead of strengthening those families is doing more harm than good.